Think Centre condemns impending execution of Muhammad Ridzuan Bin Md Ali

Sticky
Posted by Think Centre under Policy Watch, Statement on 18 May 2017

Think Centre is greatly disturbed by the imminent execution of Muhammad Ridzuan Bin Md Ali scheduled for this Friday morning, 19 May 2017. We regret that the Cabinet of Singapore has once again failed to advise the sitting President to grant clemency. The last known clemency was granted 19 years ago in 1998 by the first elected President of Singapore, the late honourable Mr. Ong Teng Cheong. The case of Muhd Ridzuan shows that the death penalty regime is still as irrefutably flawed as it was, before the amendment in 2012. The Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) has the sole prerogative over a drug courier’s life or death. The State has failed to put forward any decisive case on whether these executions have successfully disrupted any major syndicate. We call for the State to re-enact a moratorium on the death penalty and consider more humane, compassionate and effective policies against such crimes.

Keep Reading →

Think Centre’s tribute to Fong Swee Suan

Sticky
Posted by Think Centre under Breaking News on 7 February 2017

A pioneering leader in our struggle for independence against British rule, he was a leader of the Barisan Socialis, co-founder of the People’s Action Party, and an ardent trade unionist. Mr Fong Swee Suan left his mark on the early struggles for Singapore’s political freedom, self-determination and fight for the common workers’ dignity.

Keep Reading →

Singapore, Vote for UN Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty

Sticky
Posted by Think Centre under Policy Watch, Statement on 16 December 2016

Singapore laws, especially on the death penalty, are rooted in our colonial history, which the colonial masters used to reign in, control and exploit a disunited colony of immigrants. Such archaic colonial practices and attitudes should be reviewed and removed from the penal code. If Singapore wants to play the cautious conservative on the issue of enacting a moratorium, which is a clear commitment in recognising the sanctity of human life, it can abstain and watch as it falls behind in moral authority among its peers. The Think Centre, however, urges the Singapore government to rise up to the moral challenge and vote for the resolution on moratorium on the use of the death penalty.

Keep Reading →

Local and International groups express solidarity for the families of executed prisoners in Singapore

Sticky
Posted by Think Centre under Human Rights Watch, Policy Watch, Statement on 26 November 2016

We, the undersigned organisations, condemn the shameful execution of a Nigerian national, Chijioke Stephen Obioha, and a Malaysian national, Devendran a/l Supramaniam in Singapore on 18 November 2016, which runs counter to global trends towards abolition of capital punishment. We remain appalled that Singapore continues to execute people in contravention of international law and standards. We would like to express our regret and share in the disappointment of the families of the executed men. We oppose the use of capital punishment in all circumstances, as a violation of human rights which can never be justified under the flawed assumption that it has a unique deterrent effect.

Keep Reading →

Singapore: New Contempt of Court Law Further Curtails Limited Freedom of Expression

Sticky
Posted by Think Centre under Policy Watch, Statement on 22 August 2016

The Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA) and its Singaporean member, Think Centre, condemn the passage of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Bill by the Singaporean Parliament on Monday 15 August. It further restricts the limited right to freedom of expression and press freedom in the country. The new Law deems contempt of court a criminal offence punishable by disproportionate penalties and provides a vague and broad definition of contempt including prejudicing court matters, disobeying court orders, and scandalising the courts. “The Law can be used to silence citizens, civil society, and human rights organisations from voicing their opinions over any judicial process. Speaking out on judicial errors as part of exercising the right to freedom of expression is essential to exposing injustice,” says Mukunda Kattel, Director of FORUM-ASIA. “Given the tremendously difficult situation in Singapore regarding freedom of expression, the new Law can only be seen as another attempt by the Government to restrict the work of civil society,” adds Samydorai Sinapan, Director of ASEAN Affairs, Think Centre.

Keep Reading →

Oral Statement Delivered On behalf of (FORUM-ASIA) at the 24th June 2016 Universal Periodic Review plenary on Singapore

Sticky
Posted by Think Centre under Statement on 24 July 2016

We are alarmed that Singapore has rejected nearly half of the 236 recommendations it received. This sets a negative precedence regionally and globally for the UPR process and is a disturbing indication of the country’s unwillingness to cooperate with international human rights processes.

Keep Reading →

Oral Statement Delivered by Think Centre President Adrian Heok on Singapore's UPR report at the 32nd Session of Human Rights Council

Sticky
Posted by Think Centre under Statement on 24 July 2016

Without an independent way of verifying the government’s claims about compliance, it is critical that a national human rights institution be established immediately in accordance with the Paris Principles. Prolonged detentions without judicial review under the Internal Security Act and the Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act continue with no transparency over the numbers being detained. Executions often take place without adequate warning given to the prisoners or their families. We regret that the government rejected the 25 recommendations that called for the abolition of the death penalty and corporal punishment.

Keep Reading →

Every Voice Makes Us Stronger. Speak Up Against the Death Penalty!

Sticky
Posted by Think Centre under on 28 May 2016

Often those against the death penalty may not speak up. We may not believe one voice can make a difference. But if each one of us speaks up, our collective voice gets louder and stronger against the death penalty - and the death penalty can be abolished.

Keep Reading →

Capital Punishment: Singapore’s blatant disregard for the right to life

Sticky
Posted by Think Centre under Breaking News, Human Rights Watch, Policy Watch on 20 May 2016

The family of Kho Jabing is in anguish as they are forced to confront his death after his conviction for unintentional murder was upheld and appeals quashed. The same Apex court of 5 judges dismissed Kho Jabing appeal against his death penalty today. Think Centre strongly deplores the imminent execution of Kho Jabing today. Although amendments were made to the death penalty regime in 2012, the Government of Singapore continues its defence of the death penalty at both the national and international arena. Singapore's amended death penalty regime is deeply flawed through its failure to apply the minimum threshold required under international law. Many international law experts, academics, and human rights groups have repeatedly expressed concern that Singapore's justification for the deterrent value of the death penalty is without substance. The Government has consistently failed to produce any verifiable or credible empirical evidence in support of its position. Stripped bare of all cleverly worded language, what is left exposed, is a simple emotional appeal for retribution that serves no one's benefit except to demonstrate the overwhelming and unbearable power of the State to determine one's life and death. What is ironic is that the implementation of capital punishment is in itself, through the extensive involvement of august institutions of the Executive, Legislative and the Judiciary, a methodical and calculated act of blatant disregard for human life, par excellence.

Keep Reading →

Think Centre's 2016 Labour Day Message

Sticky
Posted by TC under Labour Watch, Statement on 1 May 2016

Ever wondered how much the uncles and aunties who clean after we eat at food courts and hawker centres earn? The construction workers who build our homes, bridges and roads? Do we think that amount they get accurately reflects the true value of their contribution to our society and economy? 50 years of single-minded focus on economic development has made it almost impossible for a large segment of workers to find decent work and provide for their families. Most Singaporeans work amongst the longest hours in the world. Wages remain depressed and stagnant for many while companies continue to increase their profits. The only way for real productivity to increase is to strengthen and build the resilience of workers through real strategic investments in their skills and capability and not just as an afterthought. For the longest time, the benefit of a company’s increased profits has gone to shareholders and directors, who even with rising operational cost would rather pass the burden to the consumers and workers than deduct their own salaries, bonuses of directors and top management. We have enabled firms to make careless use of this cheap labour. To protect the workers adequately, we urge the government to harmonise the Labour Laws with International Labour Standards as reflected in the 1998 ILO Declaration which spells out the fundamental principles and rights at work. This is a similar call to many of the countries that made recommendations to our government at the recent Universal Periodic Review conducted by the United Nations in Geneva. Think Centre urges the Government to amend or remove outdated policies to protect the rights of all workers and their families.

Keep Reading →

MEDIA STATEMENT BY ALMOS ON THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW

Sticky
Posted by Think Centre under Human Rights Watch, Policy Watch, Human Rights Education, Statement on 11 December 2015

As Singapore prepares to engage other United Nations member states on its human rights record at the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) in January 2016, it is clear that much more needs to be done by the government to properly address human rights issues, including to engage Singaporeans on the meaning of human rights in an inclusive society. The Alliance of Like-Minded CSOs in Singapore (ALMOS) is particularly concerned by the government�s overly-broad citation of �national security� in response to questions on the human rights impact of its practices. Citizens are not given a clear indication of the parameters of these security concerns; nor are they provided with convincing evidence that what the state practices is in proportion to the supposed security risks. It has also failed to explain how national security necessitates the turning away of refugees who have been persecuted in their home countries.

Keep Reading →

Violation of Human Dignity And Freedom of Expression in Vietnam

Posted by under Human Rights Watch on 21 January 2001

Dr. Nguyen Dan Que, a prominent dissident in Vietnam, was recently harassed by the government. This time he was humiliated by a mock people's court trial. This is a new way to violate human dignity and freedom of expression.

Keep Reading →

SUARAM's Letter to SUHAKAM

Posted by under News on 21 January 2001

Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM), a human rights advocacy group in Malaysia, questions Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM or the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia set up by the Malaysian Government) on their refusal to monitor the recent People's Gathering in Malaysia.

Keep Reading →

Daughter On Trial But Father Named, WHY?

Posted by D P Yadav under Media Watch on 20 January 2001

The media have set another precedent recently: if you ever get charged in court, your parent could be named too. Read on about how one father has been brought into the trial of his daughter by our media.

Keep Reading →

East Asians Acquiring Submarines to Guard Sea-Lanes

Posted by Michael Richards under Policy Watch on 20 January 2001

Seeking to protect their coastlines and maritime trade routes from attack, East Asian navies are turning increasingly to submarines that are difficult to detect and armed with weapons that can sink even the largest warships. .As regional economies recover from the financial crisis of 1997 and 1998 largely as a result of growing seaborne trade, countries across the region are once again raising their military spending, officials and analysts said Sunday.

Keep Reading →

Give Singapore Politics a Level Playing Field

Posted by Bryan Lim under Letters on 20 January 2001

A truncated version of this letter by Bryan Lim of the Young Democrats appeared in Today (Wed 17 Jan 2001 p6). Read on as we bring you the unedited version.

Keep Reading →

Lost legacy of Singapore's 'campongs'

Posted by Salbiah Ahmad under News on 19 January 2001

Balik kampung to Singapore for Hari Raya might sound strange to Malaysians. Singapore a kampong? To a whole generation of Singaporeans, kampung is only indigenous to Malaysia or Batam.

Keep Reading →

Talk on the Palestinian Conflict

Posted by under Public Forums on 19 January 2001

With the ever changing and volatile situation in the Middle East with regards to the Israeli and Palestinian conflict, this talk by an expert comes at an opportune time! If you don't want to miss it, read on to find out more!

Keep Reading →

Warrior Of The Fourth Estate

Posted by Zakiah Koya under Features on 18 January 2001

In the 1961 Utusan strike', Said Zahari, chief editor of Utusan Melayu, resisted all attempts by Umno to make the leading Malay newspaper its party organ. It was only in that one incident did national history record an uprising by journalists. It was the first and only time the nation witnessed journalists and workers of a press institution standing together to uphold freedom of the press.

Keep Reading →

Letter from Manila - (Estrada Protests)

Posted by Barnard C. Balquiedra under Letters on 18 January 2001

Things are getting more exciting, and tense at the same time, here in Metro Manila.Last night at around 10:00 PM 11 out of 21 senator-judges in the impeachment court voted against the opening of a second envelope containing bank records that will allegedly show that Estrada, hiding under the name Jose Velarde, keeps more than 3.3 billion pesos in a bank.... that's way over his declared assets of only 30-something million pesos.

Keep Reading →